Skip to content

Conservatives and Conservation

October 11, 2010

It has long bemused me that conservatives in Australia and the U.S. show a knee-jerk hostility to environmentalism.

Bill McKibben, author of Eaarth and The End of Nature takes this up in The New Republic October 6.  He writes:

The odd and troubling thing about this stance is not just that it prevents action. It’s also profoundly unconservative. If there was ever a radical project, monkeying with the climate would surely qualify. Had the Soviet Union built secret factories to pour carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and threatened to raise the sea level and subvert the Grain Belt, the prevailing conservative response would have been: Bomb them. Bomb them back to the Holocene—to the 10,000-year period of climatic stability now unraveling, the period that underwrote the rise of human civilization that conservatism has taken as its duty to protect. Conservatism has always stressed stability and continuity; since Burke, the watchwords have been tradition, authority, heritage. The globally averaged temperature of the planet has been 57 degrees, give or take, for most of human history; we know that works, that it allows the world we have enjoyed. Now, the finest minds, using the finest equipment, tell us that it’s headed toward 61 or 62 or 63 degrees unless we rapidly leave fossil fuel behind, and that, in the words of NASA scientists, this new world won’t be “similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on earth is adapted.” Conservatives should be leading the desperate fight to preserve the earth we were born on.

In the U.S. Republican support for saving America’s ravaged, poisoned environment died with Richard Nixon’s administration.  It’s part of the Teddy Roosevelt legacy no current Republican is brave enough to invoke.

One Comment
  1. rogerthesurf permalink
    October 11, 2010 12:53 pm

    ” Now, the finest minds, using the finest equipment, tell us that it’s headed toward 61 or 62 or 63 degrees unless we rapidly leave fossil fuel behind”

    I think the finest minds will tell you that they can measure things reasonably well but there is no concrete evidence for the causation of the current warming.

    Cheers

    Roger

    http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: